This stock IPO'ed at about 42 in January 2006, peaked at 714! in January 2015, and is currently at about 660.
To be sure, it is in frothy territory - a P/E of about 46 (although nice EPS of about 14). Forty six is a very high P/E for a restaurant stock!
(Compare to P/E of say, about 27 for Starbucks, 32 for Wendy's and 23 for Yum Brands (KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell)).
CMG is part of the craze that is taking the country by storm - higher end "fast food" places that purport to give you a much more healthful meal at a price that is not too much higher than McDonald's.
(Which, incidentally, McDonald's is in BIG trouble lately
McDonald's CEO out as troubles mount - Fortune
mostly because people of the New Millennium are apparently getting TIRED of eating that unhealthful crap.)
Compare CMG to a new stock that just came out, Shake Shack (SHAK) that started as a hot dog cart 14 years ago but just became a $1.7 billion dollar behemoth. SHAK offers no antibiotic and no hormone burgers (but then, so does Carl's, Jr. now, with its "All Natural" burger that made waves with its "All" Nude Superbowl Commercial with Charlotte McKinney
Carl’s Jr. debuts sexist Super Bowl 2015 commercial - The Washington Post
)
At current valuations, SHAK's 63 restaurants are valued at $26 million each (while at current stock prices McDonald's is at $2.5M for each of its 36,258 global outlets).
Now, are stocks like SHAK or CMG valued excessively, or are they (like AMZN) stocks that should be valued not on their P/E and EPS but rather on earnings? Time will tell.
Currently, I have traded CMG but I came very late to the party so I don't hold much of this stock.
To be sure, it is in frothy territory - a P/E of about 46 (although nice EPS of about 14). Forty six is a very high P/E for a restaurant stock!
(Compare to P/E of say, about 27 for Starbucks, 32 for Wendy's and 23 for Yum Brands (KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell)).
CMG is part of the craze that is taking the country by storm - higher end "fast food" places that purport to give you a much more healthful meal at a price that is not too much higher than McDonald's.
(Which, incidentally, McDonald's is in BIG trouble lately
McDonald's CEO out as troubles mount - Fortune
mostly because people of the New Millennium are apparently getting TIRED of eating that unhealthful crap.)
Compare CMG to a new stock that just came out, Shake Shack (SHAK) that started as a hot dog cart 14 years ago but just became a $1.7 billion dollar behemoth. SHAK offers no antibiotic and no hormone burgers (but then, so does Carl's, Jr. now, with its "All Natural" burger that made waves with its "All" Nude Superbowl Commercial with Charlotte McKinney
Carl’s Jr. debuts sexist Super Bowl 2015 commercial - The Washington Post
)
At current valuations, SHAK's 63 restaurants are valued at $26 million each (while at current stock prices McDonald's is at $2.5M for each of its 36,258 global outlets).
Now, are stocks like SHAK or CMG valued excessively, or are they (like AMZN) stocks that should be valued not on their P/E and EPS but rather on earnings? Time will tell.
Currently, I have traded CMG but I came very late to the party so I don't hold much of this stock.
Comment